Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Friday, August 23, 2024

Proud Democrat

I'm trying not to get too excited but after watching the week-long Democratic National Convention I am full of hope! It was a joyful event.  Kamala will make an excellent POTUS.  

It was good to see our old friends, former Presidents Obama and Clinton and former First Ladies Obama and Clinton, and our new friends, a group of Republicans, including some who had voted for TFG before, who are voting for Harris. I got a little teary-eyed when Senator Warren came out and was given a raucously long ovation that moved her to tears. I enjoyed all the zingers, many of them couch references. (I almost want to try and feel bad for JD Vance but the guy is such a dick I don't.  That guy can sit on a tack.) And I even think it is okay that neither Beyonce or Swift made an appearance. Would've been cool if they had but it is totally fine that they did not.  Kamala didn't need them.  

Vote blue, America.

Friday, January 08, 2021

Twitter

 After yesterday's attempted coup at the Capitol it is hard to imagine anything joyful but @jack did this 

and now I am nearly gleeful.  Trump is still in office and things are still scary but Pelosi et al. are moving to impeach on Monday if he cannot be convinced to resign.  It remains to be seen if Republicans will have the courage to put country over party. 

Monday, October 19, 2020

Election 2020

 


Tuesday, October 06, 2020

Portland Hellscape

Some of my family members who live out of state and probably are subjected to Fox News believe that Portland is an unsafe war torn hellscape.  Today, I took the kid downtown to check out what is going on. This is what we found.


 

Wednesday, December 04, 2019

Impeachment

Lord have mercy, please can this man be removed from office?

I have many thoughts I care not to share right now about this man and his presidency and the impeachment inquiry and my mounting disappointment in Republicans, but right now, I want to thank Prof. Michael Gerhardt, Prof. Noah Feldman, and Prof. Pamela S. Karlan for arguing so eloquently about why the President's actions are impeachable offenses.

Monday, October 08, 2018

Devastated

Still.

This resonated with me:
"As senators who represent a shrinking portion of the population prepare to confirm a justice more Americans oppose than support, who was nominated by a president for whom most of the electorate did not vote, the crisis of American democracy comes into sharp relief. Whatever their self-perception, Republican control of the three branches of government is countermajoritarian. With the guardrails of separated powers broken, the last remaining defense for American democracy and the rule of law is the electorate itself." --Click here for the full article.
The only thing that will save us now is if people vote.

Tuesday, November 08, 2016

Saturday, November 05, 2016

He'll never be Alex P. Keaton

Today, my little one helped me hold the pen as I filled in the bubble to vote for the first woman President of the United States. After I completed the rest of the ballot and signed the form, he then walked with me up to the library in our neighborhood to drop it into the ballot box. What an amazing time for this kid to live in. At some point he'll realize how incredible it was that the first president he can remember was the first black man to be president and the one after that was the first woman to be president. How lucky am I to be this kid's mom? I originally held fears that he would grow up to become some horrible version of Alex P. Keaton but he is a wonderfully giving, compassionate person with a gentle heart. He'd never vote for Drumpf. #imwithher

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Final presidential debate

What really has me jazzed about tonight's debate is this weekend's SNL episode that will inevitably showcase Kate McKinnon's Clinton character and the fabulous Alec Baldwin as Trump. The latest had me in stitches! You can watch it here, if you want.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

First fundraiser event at the condo!

I'm a bundler! Okay, so really awesome bundlers agree to bring in a lot of cash, I did not. But I did gather like-minded folks together to feed 'em desserts whilst watching the debate and then, before they left, they donated money that I then bundled and donated to Clinton's campaign. So far the tally is $700 and I know a couple people donated themselves by going to Clinton's campaign site so we're inching our way to $1000 if not just over that. It was a great way to watch our next Commander-in-Chief kick He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named's behind. 

Treats served included Nanaimo bars, cherry shortbread cookies, pumpkin cookies, raspberry bars, brownies, and key lime pie. Thanks to Amber, we also snacked on cheese, crackers, and salami. Guests drank a variety of beer, wine, and the Red Pantsuit (a.k.a. vodka and cranberry) libation. 

There were buttons for everyone to take home to proudly display their support for Clinton, courtesy of Sandy at Dormers, who gave them to me for free after I walked her dog, Jake. Thanks to Heather, fundraising genius that she is, we had a mini silent auction. She brought new copies of three of her favorite books from last year to auction off during the evening. 

Of course, there were pictures...






Tuesday, August 02, 2016

If we voted today...

Clinton clinches it.
--NY Times

Thursday, July 28, 2016

There's a first time for everything

Including for the first woman ever to accept the nomination for the presidency. Exciting, momentous, inspiring, awesome - these are just a few adjectives to explain this moment. What an amazing day and what an amazing women!
And, yes, the boy did stay up past his normal bedtime and he watched the entire speech with us. I find it incredible that the first president he'll remember is an African-American and that the second will most likely be a woman. How very cool!

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Monday, September 14, 2015

Where did all these Republicans go?

Quote of the day
"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them...
There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both. I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in 'A,' 'B,' 'C,' and 'D.' Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of 'conservatism.'" - Barry Goldwater, prophet.

Hat tip: The Atlantic

Friday, July 04, 2014

Hobby Lobby unhappiness

SCOTUS handed down a very disappointing decision in the Hobby Lobby case. I am frustrated and disappointed and angry and saddened and feel powerless.

These are awful feelings to have.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are 58.1% of women in the workforce in the United States. The incomes these women earn and the subsequent taxes they pay help to pay for roads, emergency services, and tax breaks that are given to corporations.

That public road leading up to your Hobby Lobby store, women's tax revenue helped pay for that. The fire truck that was dispatched when your store caught on fire, women's tax revenue helped pay for that, too. And when the state offered you tax breaks to set up your business, women's tax revenue helped pay for that.

We live in a pluralistic society, we won't agree on everything. But I do expect a fairer shake for myself and every other woman than we've been given. Just as my taxes are used for things that I do not agree with, so should yours. Believing in a given religion should not be an automatic opt out card of society when you derive many of the benefits of that society.

In the wake of this decision, and this one, too, I'd like to suggest the following:

1. We make all forms of birth control available over the counter.*
2. We give all women of child-bearing years an annual stipend to pay for contraceptives out of pocket.
3. For any women wanting an IUD, we set up a processing center where requests are received and payment is issued, with zero bureaucracy since having to go through this process is burdensome enough.
4. Any female employee who works for a company with an insurance plan that does not cover birth control, can opt out of said insurance and sign up for insurance under the ACA, with subsidies to cover the cost in its entirety.
5. Boycott Hobby Lobby stores. Women make an estimated 75-85% of all household purchasing decisions. Let your voices be heard by not supporting this company.


*I'm not sure what to do if the stores attempt to opt out of stocking contraceptives for religious reasons. What a world we live in, eh? Isn't this 2014?

Tuesday, April 08, 2014

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

What the hell are they thinking?

F---ing Roberts.

Dave sums it up best with this comment:
"I don't even have $2600 to give to a single candidate much less $1 million to toss around to dozens of candidates. All I have is a measly vote, which seems to count for less and less these days."

Although A.P. was pretty spot on, too:
"One nation, under the dollar."

Puarau said:
"Free Speech has become an oxymoron. Without millions in my bank account, who is going to listen to me?"

Sunday, February 02, 2014

One of the better quotes on the minimum wage...

“Why have one job at $15/hour, when you can have two at $7.50?”
Samantha Bee
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Tue, Jan 28, 2014

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Reactions to the Supreme Court's DOMA decision


“Today is a tragic day for marriage and our nation. The Supreme Court has dealt a profound injustice to the American people by striking down in part the federal Defense of Marriage Act.  The Court got it wrong. The federal government ought to respect the truth that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, even where states fail to do so. The preservation of liberty and justice requires that all laws, federal and state, respect the truth, including the truth about marriage.”
- U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
“The enormity of today’s decisions cannot be overstated. The combined impact of these two rulings puts our nation further down the inevitable and proper path towards full marriage equality for the LGBT community. All Americans should rejoice in today’s decisions because they bring us that much closer to fulfilling the promise of our Constitution.”
- Rev. C. Welton Gaddy, president of Interfaith Alliance
“We have seen a rapidity of cultural change that is mind-boggling. Christians of every denomination need desperately to repent of our sin, call upon the name of the Lord, and be more involved than ever in being salt and light! We should be thankful that our God is not involved in changing his mind or listening to every wind of culture…We believe this is a wrong decision with far-reaching moral and religious liberty implications.”
- Frank S. Page, President and CEO, Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention
“We have long believed that the principle of equal treatment under federal law means equal treatment for all. The Court’s landmark decision in Windsor affirms the principle that legally married same-sex couples are entitled to all of the federal rights, protections and benefits of civil marriage. The Court’s second decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry is good news for same-sex couples in California. We welcome that result and will continue to work towards the day when all states in the nation will allow civil marriage for same-sex couples.”
- Barry Curtiss-Lusher and Abraham H. Foxman, national chair and national director, respectively, of the The Anti-Defamation League
“The Supreme Court had the opportunity to uphold both marriage and democracy, and it did neither. The Supreme Court also did not unilaterally create a new right to redefine marriage. Instead the Court has allowed the conversation on marriage to continue.”
- Galen Carey, Vice President, National Association of Evangelicals 
“We are deeply saddened by today’s decision to not only allow but encourage same-sex marriage in our country—a country that was founded on biblical principles. We mourn for America’s future, but we are not without hope. Our next line of defense is to vigorously protect our religious liberty.”
Tim Wildmon, president of American Family Association
“My greatest desire before I die has been for my marriage, my love, for Phillip, to be recognized by my government…Today is a great day for justice. This is a great day for the U.S. and a great day for the advancement of equality under the law, and a great day for families and for children and for love.”
- Rev. Troy Perry, founder, Metropolitan Community Church
“It is clear from today’s two rulings that the ball has been moved down the field to a point where the pro-gay marriage side is in the red zone. Whether they can be stopped from crossing the goal line depends solely on the prospects of having a constitutional amendment affirming marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The 38 states needed to pass such an amendment are not the problem—we already have 38 states that have their own laws restricting marriage to a man and a woman—the problem is getting two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate to agree…The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops supports a federal marriage amendment. The Catholic League does as well.”
- Bill Donohue, president, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights
“This is a proud and momentous day for all who have suffered under this law and felt discrimination based on their sexual orientation. It is a victory for the principle that civil rights belong to all…While I am disappointed that the Supreme Court did not declare the freedom to marry as a constitutionally-protected “equal protection” right that would apply to all states, I applaud this historic step towards equality.”
- Rev. Peter Morales, president, Unitarian Universalist Association
“Today’s Supreme Court opinions on marriage are a stunning and indefensible display of judicial activism…Sadly, these twin decisions will undermine the already low respect for the federal courts and the rule of law.  They underscore why people of faith must remain engaged and energetic in seeing genuine conservatives nominated and confirmed to the federal courts.”
- Ralph Reed, chairman, Faith & Freedom Coalition Chairman
“As members of the Catholic Church and citizens of the United States, we are elated that the U. S. Supreme Court has both struck down the Defense of Marriage Act and cleared the way for marriage equality in the state of California. We are especially pleased to see that Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Catholic, wrote the opinion striking down DOMA, and that Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who is also a Catholic, concurred in this historic decision.”
-Equally Blessed, a coalition of four Catholic organizations  
“As an organization grounded in the values of secularism and humanism, which recognize the intrinsic value of every person, we are delighted to celebrate these milestones in the struggle for full equality before the law for all citizens. DOMA and Prop 8 were betrayals of the secular ideals set forth in our founding documents, relegating LGBT Americans to second-class status. The Court’s rejection of these measures strongly reinforces the idea that religiously based attitudes on sex and marriage will not stand in the way of granting fundamental rights to anyone.”
- Michael De Dora, Director of Public Policy, Center for Inquiry
“While we are disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the court today did not impose the sweeping nationwide redefinition of natural marriage that was sought. Time is not on the side of those seeking to create same-sex ‘marriage.’ As the American people are given time to experience the actual consequences of redefining marriage, the public debate and opposition to the redefinition of natural marriage will undoubtedly intensify.”
- Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council  
“We are ringing our bells at the Cathedral to celebrate the extension of federal marriage equality to all the same-sex couples modeling God’s love in lifelong covenants. Our prayers for continued happiness are with them and with all couples who will be joined in matrimony in the years to come, whether at Washington National Cathedral or elsewhere…Today’s rulings advance civil marriage equality, but they should also serve as a call for Christians to embrace religious marriage equality.”
- Rev. Gary Hall, dean of Washington National Cathedral
“I applaud the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act. This was discrimination enshrined in law. It treated loving, committed gay and lesbian couples as a separate and lesser class of people. The Supreme Court has righted that wrong, and our country is better off for it. We are a people who declared that we are all created equal – and the love we commit to one another must be equal as well.”
- President Barack Obama
“Hispanic Christians are both in support of biblical marriage and against homophobia. Today’s ruling opens the door for inevitable intolerance towards people of faith who repudiate bigotry, defend the image of God in all human beings and also believe that marriage is a sacred union defined by Him.”
- Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, President, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference
“Regardless of the court decision, the Church remains irrevocably committed to strengthening traditional marriage between a man and a woman, which for thousands of years has proven to be the best environment for nurturing children. Notably, the court decision does not change the definition of marriage in nearly three fourths of the states.”
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
“I join with millions of Christians across the country in celebrating today’s Supreme Court rulings that extend equal protection under federal law to all marriages and allow marriage equality to resume in California. We are moving ever closer to civil laws that recognize the God-given dignity and equality of our lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender sisters and brothers.”
- Rev. Gay Clark Jennings, president of the House of Deputies of The Episcopal Church
“This decision is far-reaching, with massive implications for family life and religious liberty. The grounding of this decision in equal protection and human dignity means this is not simply a procedural matter of federalism. This is a new legal reality. Regardless of what happens with marriage, the gospel doesn’t need ‘family values’ to flourish. In fact, it often thrives when it is in sharp contrast to the cultures around it.”
- Russell D. Moore, President, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention 
“We aren’t done, not nearly done. Changing legal architecture provides recourse against acts of discrimination. The Court rightly bolstered the bedrock for equality. What needs to also change are social attitudes. Now it is up to us to shape the social architecture toward justice and to further expand the atmosphere of its reach.”
- Jason Frye, coordinator, LGBTQ Humanist Council
“Society’s mores may shift and crumble but eternal verities exist.  One is marriage, the union of a man and a woman. Its sanctity may have been grievously insulted by the High Court today, but that sanctity remains untouched.”
-Agudath Israel, a national Orthodox Jewish organization 
“In response to the decisions announced today by the United States Supreme Court with reference to the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8, we reiterate the historical position of the Jewish faith, enunciated unequivocally in our Bible, Talmud and Codes, which forbids homosexual relationships and condemns the institutionalization of such relationships as marriages. Our religion is emphatic in defining marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman. Our beliefs in this regard are unalterable. At the same time, we note that Judaism teaches respect for others and we condemn discrimination against individuals.”
- Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America 
“I am grateful that the Supreme Court upheld the right of the states to legally define marriage as the union of a man and a woman, rather than striking down such laws via judicial fiat. However, I am concerned that the Court’s uniformly negative portrayal of opponents of same-sex marriage in United States v. Windsor is both false and demeaning. And I am concerned that its Fifth Amendment reasons for overturning the federal definition of marriage (in the Defense of Marriage Act) will be used in the future to overturn similar state definitions.”
- George O. Wood, General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God
“Civil marriage law should be based on principles of fairness, liberty and equality, not religious doctrine. These decisions are important steps toward that goal. Religious Right groups and their allies are fighting a losing battle to impose their theology and moral views about marriage on everyone. The decisions today are two more losses for their discriminatory agenda.”
-Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director, Americans United 
“On behalf of the 1,700 rabbis of the Rabbinical Assembly, I Join with Jews across California and the United States in acknowledging today’s Supreme Court decisions as opening the way for loving and committed same-sex couples to enjoy the rights and privileges of marriage. This is most clearly modeled in the case of Edith Windsor, a Holocaust survivor who enjoyed a loving relationship with her wife of many decades, and had been unable to inherit her partner’s estate as her spouse.”
Rabbi Gerald Skolnik, president, Rabbinical Assembly
“As Christians, we believe and confess that God Himself instituted marriage as the life-long union of one man and one woman. Same-sex unions are contrary to God’s will, and gay marriage is, in the eyes of God, no marriage at all. As Christians, we proclaim this truth, no matter what the courts or legislatures may say. We are called not to popularity but to truth. Therefore, we call on our fellow Christians to be faithful first to God’s Word, knowing that another court is ultimately supreme.”
-Rev. Bart Day, executive director, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod’s Office of National Mission
“While our community faces many other significant challenges, marriage equality is an issue that affects many transgender people in this country. It’s good for all of us when the government gets out of the business of using gender to decide who gets access to certain benefits. This is a tremendous victory for the entire LGBT community. We urge the state of California to act quickly to allow same-sex couples to marry again.”
- Masen Davis, Executive Director of Transgender Law Center
“The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which we vigorously opposed when it was first considered, has been an offensive and discriminatory measure since its passage in 1996. Since then millions have been denied fundamental rights because of the impact of this ill-advised law. Though that law still stands, today’s ruling in Windsor v. United States promises to lessen some of its most damaging effects. By striking down Article Three of DOMA – a section of the law that the Obama Administration stopped defending several years ago – the Court has enabled legally married same-sex couples to receive the same federal benefits, rights and responsibilities as married heterosexual couples.”
- Union for Reform Judaism, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism and the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism
“The Court’s decision today has failed the people of California because it has the potential effect of nullifying the Citizens of their lawful vote. While we recognize that certain members within our society think that justice has been served, they should consider how they will feel one day when their rightful vote is stripped of meaning on some future issue just because the ruling political party disagrees with the people’s vote and chooses not to defend the law.”
- Robert Tyler, General Counsel, Advocates for Faith & Freedom
“We at Muslims for Progressive Values are thrilled in the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the definition of marriage as being exclusively between a man and a woman. The Quran defines marriage as the union of two souls. We congratulate the Supreme Court for affirming the universal values of justice and equality for all and in its decision to dismiss the appeal of Proposition 8.”
- Ani Zonneveld, President, Muslims for Progressive Values
“We are stunned at this decision today to take a 360-degree turn away from the biblical definition of marriage. While this decision is a setback to all we have fought for to protect marriage, we must continue to work to keep marriages and families intact, the way God intended them, and  pray for a continued revival of the values upon which this country was founded.”
- Sam Rohrer, president, Pennsylvania Pastors’ Network
“While these rulings are positive steps forward, they are only two steps in the  process of establishing equal rights and protections for all. Currently, same sex couples are allowed to legally marry in only a handful of states.  We must continue the efforts to bring full equality for all in each state.”
- Rev. Peter E. Hickman, Presiding Bishop, Ecumenical Catholic Communion 
“Today is a devastating day for traditional marriage and religious freedom. In spite of the blow to this sacred union, we must always remember that marriage is precious, a biblical gift, and one that should not have been tainted by redefining it in a way that is counter to God’s plan for families and for America. Defining marriage for the American people is way above the Supreme Court’s pay grade. God created marriage and He has defined its parameters, regardless of what the majority of Supreme Court justices might think.”
- Richard Land, President, Southern Evangelical Seminary
“The Court ignored the votes of a large bipartisan majority of members of Congress. It is absurd for the Court to suggest that Congress does not have the power to define the meaning of words in statutes that Congress itself has enacted…This is a serious loss for federalism and democratic self-government. We must work to reverse it and to defend the rights of all Americans to make marriage policy.”
- Ryan T. Anderson, scholar, Heritage Foundation 
“Freedom and equality won today as the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the US Constitution and every family. Children in California now know their families will be treated equally. Today, every American is free to live in the assurance that their loved ones will receive all benefits the US gives to any other family. As the head of MCC, a global church founded on the belief that all people are created equal before God and the law, I am thrilled that the Supreme Court decided that the US Constitution applies to all of us, regardless of our sexual orientation or gender identity.”
- Rev. Nancy Wilson, moderator, Metropolitan Community Churches
“NCJW hopes that this decision serves to highlight the uneven rights of LGBT people around the country and will inspire more states to join the growing number of marriage equality states. NCJW, long an advocate for marriage equality, pledges to redouble its efforts to win this important right nationwide.These decisions are a victory not just for the LGBT community but for all who value equality and fairness.”
- Nancy K. Kaufman, CEO, National Council of Jewish Women 
 “The decision by the United States Supreme Court not to rule in favor of proposition 8 is a slap in the face to the entire democratic process by which the will and voice of the people are respected by our courts. This is a terrible setback for not just the proper definition of marriage, but even more importantly to have the voice of the voters of California respected by their courts.”
- Brad Dacus, President, Pacific Justice Institute
“The good news is that Judge Walker’s decision has no precedential value. Marriage advocates now must look for a new way to get back in court to overturn his aggressive decision that marriage is rooted in hatred and bigotry, not  as we understand it: in the love of husband and wife who can be mother and father to their children.”
Maggie Gallagher, fellow at the American Principles Project
“Efforts to restrict same-sex couples from access to civil marriage are blatant attempts to insert religious beliefs into our secular government. We applaud the Court’s decision on DOMA and Proposition 8, but we recognize there is still a lot of work to be done throughout the country in ensuring that marriage equality is the rule for all.”
- Edwina Rogers, Executive Director, The Secular Coalition for America
“Today the Court wisely stopped the federal government from its practice of discriminating against loving couples on account of politicians’ religious bias. The Religious Right may have fought hard, but the Constitution won.”
- Roy Speckhardt, Executive Director, American Humanist Association
“Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, the debate over marriage has only just begun. The court’s decision does not silence the voices of Americans. Marriage–the union of husband and wife–will remain timeless, universal, and special, particularly because children need mothers and fathers. This has been the experience of diverse cultures and faiths throughout history, including the American experience, and that will not change.  Americans should be able to continue advancing the truth about marriage between a man and a woman and why it matters for children, civil society, and limited government.”
- Austin R. Nimocks, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom
“This is a great day for marriage equality, for all couples, gay or straight, because the Supreme Court has underscored the central point that marriage is ultimately about deep commitment between two people who love one another, not prescribed gender roles. While we still yearn for the day when equal marriage is fully legal, granted and protected in all 50 states, this is a great step toward full freedom and recognition for LGBT people by the U.S. federal government.”
- Rev. J. Bennett Guess, executive minister, United Church of Christ’s Local Church Ministries
“We are devastated that the Supreme Court succumbed to political pressure by voting to weaken the sacred institution. They neglected our most precious children who need a mother and a father united in marriage for healthy development. The African-American community has already been plagued with problems related to children growing up in single parent households. This ruling will only accelerate the further erosion of our communities and society.”
- Rev. William Owens, President of the Coalition of African-American Pastors  
“Scripture teaches us that God shows no partiality. Today our country has moved closer to this vision of equality and unity, and I give thanks for our progress. Now, as always, the ability to create a more just and caring country lies with us. Heartened by today’s decisions, may we recommit ourselves to this difficult but holy work.”
-Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington 
“Full recognition of marriage equality—the right to marry the person one loves regardless of gender—is a right whose recognition is long overdue. Today’s decisions are a large, but, unfortunately, incomplete, step in that direction…In the wake of today’s decision, AJC will continue to seek full legal recognition of same-sex marriages. Indeed, we will shortly join in one such brief in Illinois.”
- Marc D. Stern, General Counsel, American Jewish Committee
“In light of today’s Supreme Court opinion, it seems imperative to remind the faithful of the Archdiocese for the Military Services that they must never forget that all, regardless of their sexual inclination, must be treated with the respect worthy of their human dignity. As you know well, the Catholic Faith teaches clearly the biblical principle that all persons, regardless of their sexual inclination, are called to chastity regardless of their state of life..I call on all Catholics and men and women of good will to make their voices heard through the democratic process by upholding marriage in their home states.”
- Rev. Timothy P. Broglio, Archbishop for the Military Services, USA
 “We have said from the beginning that the proponents of Prop. 8 couldn’t demonstrate a single way they would be harmed by loving same-sex couples marrying in California. Marriage will be restored imminently and we look forward to decisive leadership from our elected officials in reinstating marriage for all people in every community across the state. Today is a day for celebration.”
- John O’Connor, executive director of Equality California  
 “My faith says that all persons are beloved by God and created in God’s image. This means that people should be able to marry the person they love. The Supreme Court took a historic step forward today to protect the constitutional rights of many same-sex couples who choose to enter the sacred bonds of marriage.”
- Rev. Katharine Rhodes Henderson, president of Auburn Theological Seminary
“We applaud today’s historic decisions by the Supreme Court to strike down discriminatory laws as a major victory for equal rights for LGBTI people in the United States. We believe that this is one of the necessary steps to ensure that the human rights of people of all sexual orientations are respected everywhere in the world.”
- Ruth Messinger, President, American Jewish World Service   
“The driving force behind the denial of marriage equality for same-sex relationships has always been misused religious belief. Today the Supreme Court said that individuals and their religious beliefs cannot prevail over the state in its responsibility to protect and defend the rights of its citizens.”
- Rev. Cindi Love, Executive Director, Soulforce
“The Supreme Court has ruled on gay marriage but this highly complex and emotional issue is far from being settled.  The attempt to reshape or redefine marriage will be met with fervent and persistent opposition.  Just as forty years after Roe v. Wade abortion opponents continue to fight for the pro-life agenda, pro traditional marriage supporters will fight on as well.”
- Rick McDaniel,  founder/senior pastor, Richmond Community Church in Richmond, Virginia  
“Despite the unsettling outcome of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the archdiocese is grateful for the ongoing efforts undertaken by those who uphold the authentic meaning of marriage and thankful that the Court’s rulings respect individual states’ right to recognize that true meaning. The archdiocese will continue to educate Catholics and the wider community about the truth of marriage as the union between one man and one woman.”
- Archdiocese of Washington